Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

tomcat ha · 01-31-2005, 02:54 AM

less irritating colors so yes it is better.

=D.C.L.I=Everest · 01-31-2005, 08:23 AM

Totally Meng 8) Big Grin

:tup:

Mengioto · 02-01-2005, 07:52 AM

lol, shall i take that as a compliment?

isoFlux · 02-07-2005, 08:53 PM

i might change my sig again

[Image: halosig.gif]

what do you guys/gals think, that, or my current?

SoulSurfer · 02-07-2005, 10:13 PM

BRING BACK THE FLOYD

isoFlux · (This post was last modified: 02-08-2005 04:57 AM by isoFlux.)

and as many good bands do not put their pics in their album art/liner notes, i wont put my alias in this sig Smile

\"its all about the music, not the artists\", or in this case, \"its all about the chicks, not the post\" Tongue

[JR] · 02-08-2005, 09:05 PM

Mengioto Wrote:hihi

jr, the png. version? i just played with psp, i have no idea what what is...

i just finished a new one:

maybe thats better?

The original one i sent with drop shadow and proper transparency.

Mengioto · 02-10-2005, 05:14 AM

excuse me?

[JR] · (This post was last modified: 02-10-2005 10:01 AM by [JR].)

When i made your current sig with the llama from winamp for you, it had transparency and a drop shadow effect around it. The only format useable here which supports gradiented transparency is .png. Thus, i sent you a .png version which you used on the old forums. I remember that because you complained that it looked dodgy on yours, because your browser didnt support transparency.

Here is the screenshot i took and sent to you of your sig in .png format as displayed on other peoples computers:

Also attatched is the .png version should you have misplaced it. As opposed to the current .jpg version you are using.

:wacko:

(however... attatchments dont seem to be working for me... :con: )

andius · 05-23-2005, 03:32 PM

New avatar over here...yay