less irritating colors so yes it is better.
lol, shall i take that as a compliment?
i might change my sig
again
what do you guys/gals think, that, or my current?
and as many good bands do not put their pics in their album art/liner notes, i wont put my alias in this sig
\"its all about the music, not the artists\", or in this case, \"its all about the chicks, not the post\"
Mengioto Wrote:hihi
jr, the png. version? i just played with psp, i have no idea what what is...
i just finished a new one:
maybe thats better?
The original one i sent with drop shadow and proper transparency.
When i made your current sig with the llama from winamp for you, it had transparency and a drop shadow effect around it. The only format useable here which supports gradiented transparency is .png. Thus, i sent you a .png version which you used on the old forums. I remember that because you complained that it looked dodgy on yours, because your browser didnt support transparency.
Here is the screenshot i took and sent to you of your sig in .png format as displayed on other peoples computers:
Also attatched is the .png version should you have misplaced it. As opposed to the current .jpg version you are using.
:wacko:
(however... attatchments dont seem to be working for me... :con: )
New avatar over here...yay